I am always glad to see the words,
“Thank you for your patience.” I like them so much more than
"Thanks in advance"—a thoughtless, ill-considered and standard
closing of bill collectors and which has been adopted by too many people who
ask for something and then thank the reader in advance for doing
it. Writing the words Thanks in advance is
presumptuous; thank you for your patience is not, although it
often lands in a similar position at the close of a piece of communication,
whether e-mail or hard copy.
I read the words this morning from my
banker who was attempting to resolve a bank discrepancy that he had already
admitted was the bank's fault. I didn't care whose fault it was as long
as my account was credited with the money that had gone missing.
Having promised to fix the first
attempt at fixing the problem that hadn't fixed it, my banker concluded with:
“Thank you for your patience.”
I thought it was exactly the right
moment to use those words because I had waited for him to work out the solution
and to implement it--a few business days.
But knowing when to be patient is not
always as simple as that. When I first learned of this problem, my friend
Sue offered me two words that she said worked best at encouraging others to
solve your problem: "Squeaky wheel," said Sue.
I agree with her, but I also think
there's a timing involved in being an effective squeaky wheel--a
balance that allows for being patient, too.
I squeaked a little by explaining the
problem, and then I waited.
The process reminded me of that brief
flash of a parable in the book of Luke where Jesus shows us a fig
tree that is not bearing fruit fast enough. Tempted to cut it down, the
story says, "Let's be patient. Poke the soil. Give it
time." Eugene Peterson interprets that story in THE MESSAGE in a
context that teaches people with problems to solve how to be patient, for that
is what the story is saying. There's a time to weed and uproot and a
time to poke the soil, maybe add some fertilizer, and then wait for progress to
happen.
I lean that way more often than
not. While it is tempting to squeak loudly (and I saw this done recently
at Walmart when a woman was denied a refund for a product that didn't work, and
she stood her ground and said, "You expect me to swallow a hundred dollars
for a piece of junk!"--the tactic worked; she got her money) but, in
general, I'm not comfortable squeaking loudly in public or on the page or
screen.
Instead, I try to use facts to
present my case; and having presented it, I wait. And present it
again--and wait until some inner buzzer declares: Long
enough.
Then, I squeak some more, but so
often I don't have to do that. So often, the facts and patient waiting bear the
fruit of resolving a problem, and I haven't gotten upset or upset anyone else. And during the interim while information may
be passed back and forth, what used to be called a paper trail is created. That trail is necessary for referencing
later—to remind people who may need to understand what has happened so that it
won’t happen again what did occur as it was recorded in a dispassionate way.
The next time you have a problem to
solve or a complaint to register, spend your energy on the polite presentation
of facts that represent your cause first. Then, watch the solution
grow--along with your patience. Gratitude for resolution naturally flows from
this occurrence, and it should. Don’t be
slow in saying, “Thank you” for someone’s patience or for any other reason at
all.
Daphne Simpkins' most recent book is Christmas in Fountain City
I think using "Thank you for your patience" is a great way to end a e-mail. It is courteous and it tells the reader of the e-mail that the writer thinks his or her time is important and they are grateful for it.That ending should be used in any kind of communication letter because it is a greatway of thanking someone indirectly.
ReplyDelete